Posted by: thelightblues on: 31 July, 2008
Like many Rangers fans, I did not want Kenny Miller at Ibrox because he was not good enough, and less because he played for Celtic. The evidence can be seen here on this site. (click here)
However, I fully understand that there are also Rangers fans who didn’t want him at Ibrox because he played for Celtic. And even then, to some of them that would be forgivable if Celtic were his first club, or he was a foreigner. But he was a Scotsman and he knew what he was doing. Going to Celtic and giving it lots of scrunchy-faced badge-thumping, always seemed more to rile us than anything else.
In any case, Kenny Miller being booed by a minority of the crowd against Kaunus – and it was a minority where I was sitting – was to do with football allegiance and football rivalry. It had nothing to do with religion whatsoever, which is what bigotry primarily means in Scotland. As far as I know Kenny Miller is not a Catholic.
So, it is with puzzlement that I was informed the wise Andy Devlin in the Sun today penned this glorious piece of social insight:
“In the eyes of far too many the moment Kenny Miller hauled that Hooped jersey over his head he was damned. A no-good traitor guilty of treason. Yet for those whose vision is not blurred by bigotry…” [my italics]
Do you see what he did there? He equated bigotry with disliking Celtic. In his mind if you dislike someone because they played for Celtic then you are a bigot. This is where all language breaks down and words no longer mean what they mean. Do you see the power that gives Celtic? Even to criticise them, to openly dislike them is enough to be ostracised from society – to be a bigot.
But the irony is that real bigotry is ignored if it is against Rangers fans. Raith Rovers fans on Saturday sang quite clearly that Rangers fans, should “go home ya huns” and that we were all “dirty orange b*stards.” Even Andy Devlin would have to admit this was real bigotry, yet all those journalists who were at the game heard nothing.
So here in modern Scotland we have finally come to the conclusion that disliking a player because they played for Celtic is bigotry, but real bigotry against Rangers fans is tolerated precisely because it is against Rangers fans. They don’t count you see.
It shows that zero tolerance against sectarianism was always a sham. It was never about stamping out real sectarianism. It was always partisanship dressed up as morality.
They don’t want to defeat sectarianism. They want victory.
Being a celtic fan i actually stand toe to toe with you on this. Can we not dislike something through rivalry like any other derby in the world without being deemed bigots. (BTW its not just Rangers who get that)
Although i see a little contradiction as I don’t see “Hun” as bigotted as it is nothing more than a derogatory term for describing rangers no different to “mhanks” except possibly a little more well thought out.
I agree with this loyal Rangers fan on this one. I’m from Belfast in Northern Ireland and there are slogan’s on walls in mainly republican area’s of Belfast stating “Kill all Huns” If this is not seen as bigotry I do not know what is. In my opinion I feel that everyone out there who aren’t Protestants like myself feel that our religion is a crime. Protestantism is not a crime, but a way of life. Keep up the good work. W.A.T.P
1 | AL
31 July, 2008 at 12:08 pm
As usual, articulate, concise and straight to the point. This is the article that bluenoses in the media would write if they had a pair.
The manner in which people like Andy Devlin (and a few others) have been allowed to set the agenda is because Rangers fans aren’t putting out the Rangers point of view. It’s easier to sit around and complain about this, that and the next thing.
In short, there aren’t enough websites, columns and blogs like this where a Rangers voice is heard. We’re all too busy hiding away and letting others pass comment on us without challenge.
Again, a superb article.